About the Author

Shane Goldmacher is a former reporter for Capitol Weekly. He is a graduate of UC Berkeley, where he served as editor of the Berkeley Political Review.

E-mail Shane

Favorites in Capitol Weekly

  • National NAACP bucks CA chapter, backs tobacco tax initiative

  • NAACP's Huffman assailed for tobacco, telecom payments

  • Schwarzenegger targets the 'ElimiDate Voter'

  • Legislators tap Sacramento interests for campaign cash

  • New York developer's eminent-domain crusade comes to California

  • Schwarzenegger's election-year olive branches

  • Dems, Gov. tapped same spots for campaign cash

  • Schwarzenegger has a special interest in Capitol-area money

  • Schwarzenegger's million-dollar woman

  • The kings and queens of the California political quotation

  • All about Phil: Angelides is strategist in own campaign

  • "Women of the year" married to men of Legislature

  • With new law, chase for campaign cash becomes family affair

  • High school student gives governor $44,600

  • Going to interview with CTA? Be sure to look into the camera

  • David Crane: Arnold's other Democratic adviser

  • The rise of the blogs: How the GOP uses the Web to organize

    • Sponsors


    The 2006 Election Results

    1A: 76.9-23.1
    1B: 61.3-38.7
    1C: 57.4-42.6
    1D: 56.6-43.4
    1E: 64-36
    83: 70.6-29.4
    84: 53.7-46.3
    85: 45.9-54.1
    86: 48-52
    87: 45.2-54.8
    88: 23-77
    89: 25.5-74.5
    90: 47.6-52.4

    U.S. Sen.
    Feinstein 59.7
    Mountjoy 34.9
    Gov.
    Schwarzenegger 55.8
    Angelides 39.2
    Lt. Gov
    Garamendi 49.5
    McClintock 44.9
    Atty. Gen.
    Brown 56.7
    Poochigian 37.9
    Sec. of state
    Bowen 48.5
    McPherson 44.7
    Treasurer
    Lockyer 54.8
    Parrish 37
    Controller
    Chiang 50.9
    Strickland 40.1
    Insur. Comm.
    Poizner 50.7
    Bustamante 38.9

    For complete election results click here.

    The Primary Election Results

    Gov.
    Angelides 48.2
    Westly 43.1
    Lt. Gov
    Garamendi 42.9
    Speier 39.3
    Figueroa 17.8
    Atty. Gen.
    Brown 63.2
    Delgadillo 36.8
    Sec. of state
    Bowen 61.1
    Ortiz 38.9
    Treasurer
    Parrish 56.4
    Richman 43.6
    Controller
    Democratic primary
     Chiang 53.4
    Dunn 46.6
    Republican primary
     Strickland 40.9
    Maldonado 36.9
    Insur. Comm.
    Bustamante 70.5
    Kraft 29.5
    Supt. of Schools
    O'Connell 52.5, avoids run-off

    For complete election results click here.

    The Special Election Results

    73: 47.4-52.6
    74: 45-55
    75: 46.6-53.4
    76: 38-62
    77: 40.5-59.5
    78: 41.5-58.5
    79: 38.9-61.1
    80: 34.3-65.7

    For complete election results click here.

    Search

    Google
    Web CA Observer



    Sponsors

    More Sponsors

    California Politics Links

    Journalist Blogs

    From the Right

    From the Left

    From the Middle

    Subscribe to CA Observer!



    Powered by FeedBlitz

    Previous Posts

    Archives

    CA Observer Feeds



    Subscribe in Bloglines
    Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    Add 'The California Observer' to Newsburst from CNET News.com
    Add 'The California Observer' to ODEO
    Subscribe in Rojo

    More Sponsors

    Powered by Blogger

    Monday, January 09, 2006

    To Conference Committee

    Later this week, the legislative leaders are expected to announce the gathering of a large conference committee to hammer out the details of a Legislature-approved bond.

    Three bonds, Nunez's, Perata's and Schwarzenegger's, will all go into the committee for discussion. What will come out is anyone's guess, but it is interesting that while Republicans have traditionally played the role of whittling down such bonds in conference, this time it will be the Republican governor's bond that is the biggest.

    posted by Shane Goldmacher at 4:39 PM

    Comments on "To Conference Committee"

     

    Blogger OAFFER said ... (4:57 PM) : 

    I have never liked major public policy starting in conference committee. It leaves the majority of the legislature out of the process and then presents to each House a final product which cannot be amended.

    It would be better to start with one bill in one House, and move it through the process - allowing for the greatest level of public review and discourse. This is how the legislative process was designed and this is how public policy (particulalry of this magnitude) should be developed.

     

    post a comment